All Issue

2020 Vol.29, Issue 1 Preview Page

Original Articles


January 2020. pp. 28-35
Abstract


References
1 

Baek, S., J.E., K.S. Park, K.H. Yeo, and J. Lee. 2018. Monitoring of water transportation in plant stem with microneedle sap flow sensor. JMEMS. 27(3):440-447.

10.1109/JMEMS.2018.2823380
2 

Burnett, S.E., and M.W. van Iersel. 2008. Morphology and irrigation efficiency of <i>Gaura lindheimeri</i> growth with capacitance sensor controlled irrigation. HortScie. 43:1555-1560.

10.21273/HORTSCI.43.5.1555
3 

Cardenas-Lailhacar, B., M.D. Dukes, and G.L. Miller. 2010. Sensor-based automation of irrigation on Bermuda grass during wet weather conditions. J Irr Drain Eng. 134:120-128.

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:2(120)
4 

De Swaef, T., K. Verbist, and W. Cornelis. 2012. Tomato sap flow, stem and fruit growth in relation to water availability in rockwool growing medium. Plant Soil 350:237-252.

10.1007/s11104-011-0898-4
5 

Farina, E., F.D. Battista, and M. Palagi. 2007. Automation of irrigation in hydroponics by FDR sensors-Experimental results from field trials. Acta Hortic. 747:193-196.

10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.747.21
6 

Gordon, R., D.M. Brown, A. Madani, and M.A. Dixon. 1999. An assessment of potato sap flow as affected by soil water status, solar radiation and vapour pressure deficit. Can. J. Soil Sci. 79:245-253.

10.4141/S97-079
7 

Guichard, S., N. Bertin, C. Leonardi, and C. Gary. 2001. Tomato fruit quality in relation to water and carbon fluxes. Agronomie, 21:385-392.

10.1051/agro:2001131
8 

Heuvelink, E., M.J. Bakker, L.F.M. Marcelis, and M. Raaphorst. 2008. Climate and yield in a closed greenhouse. Acta Hortic. 801:1083-1092.

10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.801.130
9 

Hunt, D.S., and J. McDonald. 2015. Automating irrigation scheduling in production nurseries using a weight-based irrigation controller. Acta hortic. 1104:49-56.

10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1104.8
10 

Jaria, F. and C.A. Madramootoo. 2013. Thresholds for irrigation management of processing tomatoes using soil moisture sensors in Southwestern Ontario. Trans. ASAE. 56(1):155-166.

10.13031/2013.42597
11 

Jones, H.G. 2004. Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. J. Exp. Bot. 55:2427-2436.

10.1093/jxb/erh21315286143
12 

Kim, S.E., Y.S. Kim, and S.Y. Sim. 2011. Design of Measuring Trays in the Irrigation System Using Drainage Electrodes for Tomato Perlite Bed Culture. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 29(6):568-574.

13 

Liu, H.F., M. Genard, S. Guichard, and N. Bertin. 2007. Model- assisted analysis of tomato fruit growth in relation to carbon and water fluxes. J. Exp. Bot. 58:3567-3580.

10.1093/jxb/erm20218057037
14 

Lizarraga, A., H. Boesveld, F. Huibers, and C. Robles. 2003. Evaluating irrigation scheduling of hydroponic tomato in Navarra, Spain. Irrig. Drain. 52:177-188.

10.1002/ird.86
15 

van der Schoot and A.J.E. van Bel. 1989. The morphogram: a novel diagram to organize the transitive secondary xylem elements of a basal tomato (<i>Solanum lycopersicum</i>) internode. Amer. J. Bot. 76:475-486.

10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb11340.x
16 

Vermeulen, K., K. Steppe, K. Janssen, P. Bleyaert, J. Dekock, J.M. Aerts, D. Berckmans, and R. Lemeur. 2007. Solutions to overcome pitfalls of two automated systems for direct measurement of greenhouse tomato water uptake. HortTech. 17:220-226.

10.21273/HORTTECH.17.2.220
17 

Woo, Y.H. 1999. Measurement and application of sap flow in plant stem. The Korean Society For Bio-Environment Control 11:1-12.

Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control
  • Publisher(Ko) :(사)한국생물환경조절학회
  • Journal Title :Protected horticulture and Plant Factory
  • Journal Title(Ko) :시설원예·식물공장
  • Volume : 29
  • No :1
  • Pages :28-35